President Bush plans (work in progress) on proposing a bill to Congress that will become part of his budget plan to reduce large costs and federal spending if he can get Congress to accept his initiative. Bush believes there is unnecessary spending in the Medicare and Medicaid programs, yet he still wants to follow through with a 3 trillion dollar spending request. Bush's primary reason for saving on public health care is to create a surplus in the economy's long run, but his plan to cut health care spending will create still even higher deficits in the coming years. I see some fairly good intentions and possibly positive effects of his budget plan. He is trying to address the issue of unnecessary spending, but what Bush views as "unnecessary", I see as misdirected and inefficient in the context of the health care program's funding and how money is appropriated within the system. I strongly believe that Bush's spending cuts should have been more directed at the insurance companies rather than focused on taking money away from Medicaid (for low-income families), nursing homes, home care agencies, and ambulances. Bush's decision to propose this bill (or rather, more clearly, to advocate for this bill) that will cut off money for health insurance programs only reinstates how weak our economy has become relative to previous years and how costly it will be to maintain this current health care system in this fledgling economy.
What especially saddens me is that it takes money away from teaching programs for prospective nurses and doctors who want to be involved in internships before becoming a full-time professional. This takes away even more potential medical specialists from the American workforce, when these highly-qualified people are already in such high demand.
As you may guess, with Democratic majorities in the House and Senate, this is a very unpopular cut, but the Bush administration saw that about one-fourth of federal spending was on Medicare and Medicaid. They decided to diminish costs instead of reapportioning the funds, and avoided reducing costs that would, even in the slightest, have impact on the economy. I am relieved that Bush chose to decrease spending on the War in Iraq, and that the bill was created so that new regulations assigned to the two health insurance programs could be heavily revised by Congress.
In the end, this discussion will most likely not even matter. This bill will be dead before it is even discussed on the floor or put up for a vote. ;) Whad'ya think?
Because of You
-
The time has come to call a halt to Buffalo’s Ruminations. I have
absolutely nothing to say that is worth the energy expended to read it. Meaningless
ja...
13 years ago
5 comments:
Hah, oh my... can you say "reverse brain-drain"?! Canada finally wins...
haha Yes, I think Canada has been winning for some time now.
Its sad how bureaucracies like the Office of Management and Budget now help play a major role in proposing legislation rather than just observing and interpreting it.
We were actually just doing a little comparative politics in my government class and we learned a little more about Canadian government and politics and...wow, its rather different from our system and political culture. But , yup.....
So, how do you feel about the Canadian structure?
I am not a big fan of the Parliamentary system, but I think it is cool that your Head of State is Queen Elizabeth II, while our Head of State is...well...you know. You wouldn't be offended if my next post pertained to my observations of the Canadian government structure?? I am not all-knowing. I definitely don't know everything there is to know about Canadian politics of course, but I am interested...so you wouldn't mind? I have both praises and critiques as I do with the American government.
Go ahead ;)
Post a Comment